.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

American Values Under Attack Image by FlamingText.com
Image by FlamingText.com

"Fighting the world wide web of wicked wrong doers."

Welcome. The aim of this site is simple - to rail against the slow, but steady chipping away of traditonal American values by a host of groups & individuals bent on destroying them.

“We know the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong. Do you not think an angel rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm?" - John Page 1776

And crown thy good with brotherhood.... ....from sea to shining sea line07-b.gif Your commentator - Francis Lynn...MySpace Profile...E-mail

Monday, October 04, 2004

Kerry - Dangerous on Nuclear Freeze

In the debate, Kerry said the President failed to show leadership on nuclear proliferation:

"And part of that leadership is sending the right message to places like North Korea. Right now the president is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to research bunker-busting nuclear weapons. The United States is pursuing a new set of nuclear weapons. It doesn’t make sense. You talk about mixed messages. We’re telling other people, “You can’t have nuclear weapons,” but we’re pursuing a new nuclear weapon that we might even contemplate using. Not this president. I’m going to shut that program down, and we’re going to make it clear to the world we’re serious about containing nuclear proliferation."

Either Kerry is grossly naive, a true nuke-freeze throw-back or a fool. There is no other answer. A bunker-busting nuclear device would reach down deep into the earth, caves or hardened bunkers where suspected wmd's could be hidden & which could not be reached by conventional bombs. But that's not the point here.

The point is that Kerry would restrict this country from developing weapons to further enhance its defense & to use in times of threats because they are "nuclear". Kerry would remove an option which ironically might preclude a greater response from us. We are not sending mixed messages, John - we are sending a clear message that if you build it, we will blow it. But Kerry is sending a message to North Korea & Iran that they have no fear putting nuclear bombs or wmd's deep in the earth, because we will not have the means to destroy them. Kerry has the audacity to put us on a morally equivalent level with North Korea or Iran or any number of rogue or despotic nations. Again: "We’re telling other people, 'You can’t have nuclear weapons,' but we’re pursuing a new nuclear weapon that we might even contemplate using."

No John, we are not telling "people" they can't have nuclear weapons, we are telling thugs, despots, murderers, fanatics, pigs. And if you can't see the difference between scum like that & this country, then it is long past time for you step down off the political stage, because you would do this country gross damage if, God forbid, you were in the White House. How anyone can vote for this fool is beyond me.

Read an answer to Kerry's dangerously idiotic idea here.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please answer.

I would like to test your opinion of which countries which countries are sane enough to have nuclear weapons. Would there be any in:
In Europe?
In South America?
In Central America?
In Asia?
In North America
Among Moslim countries?

What about biological weapons?

5:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you saying that the United States without nuclear arms does not have the military force to invade and/or destroy any country in the world? Sounds like a lot of bull to me.

5:48 PM  
Blogger JGirten said...


I was not avoiding you.. ha ha just been a crazy weekend and I will take the time to read what you wrote and repond as promptly as I can. I hope you are having a great day.


7:57 PM  
Blogger Francis Lynn said...

Anon - When you figure out what you are trying to say, let me know. Then maybe I can answer.

8:03 PM  
Blogger Francis Lynn said...

Anon - a real armchair general you are. And again - Failure on you part to defend Kerry's position in this post. Your incisive debating points are killing me. Stop it, please! (I win again)

8:08 PM  
Blogger Francis Lynn said...

JG: take your time, I will be here forever - gonna outlive all the liberals. lol

12:22 AM  
Blogger Zoomlens, Zoomlens2 said...

Good article. Right assessment. Has Kerry ever supported a weapons system, nuclear or not?..It is as if he doesn't really understand that we are at war. I suppose we should just disarm, sing kumbaya, and ask Osama to come to a summit and negotiate!..Neat site. Keep up the good work!

12:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I guess you don't want, don't have the capbility to or don't have the facts for a debate. AOK.

12:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Zoomlens! Ya need bigger glasses. Do you want to get Osama. Then you need more than the mere 12,00 troops Cheney said last night were in Afghanistan. Hmmm. where do we get these troops. Right! Their in Iraq. Looking for the weapons of mass destruction that never were there.

12:29 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source